Ten Ways That The Internet As We Know It Will Soon Be Facing ‘Endgame’

There’s no doubt about it – the world’s elite are getting scared. For the first time since the dawn of the printing press ordinary, disenfranchised people from across the world are now able to communicate, share thoughts, experiences and information that is ever more undermining the rationale of why they are kept in the shadow of poverty while the top 1% cream off the profits that they generate.

All of this is thanks to one thing – the Internet, and no surprise this is why the elite are feverishly trying to bring this medium of freedom under their control. Here’s ten points that show exactly what they are up to, and why those who want to maintain the freedom that the internet offers need to stand up and be aware of the carpet being pulled from beneath their feet.

  • 1) The dying days of net-neutrality

ISPs have been lobbying for it for years, and have finally been given the go-ahead by the FCC to market their bandwidth on a two-tier system. Not long from now we can expect to see big business and corporations using their spending power to buy the fastest servers and connections, that in turn will slow down the speeds for smaller business users.

The consequence of this is as obvious as it is bleak – the corporate monopolization of the internet leading to higher prices for the consumer, who will find it ever more difficult to find independent companies with whom they could do their business instead.

  • 2) Targeted disinformation is ever more rife

Many of us have suspected it for years, but it took Edward Snowdon to be able to confirm and prove that intelligence agencies across the world have been colluding in spreading false information – often bordering upon slander – across the web against their foes. The intention is to confuse and distract attention from the key issues, and create a state of mistrust amongst the internet community.

This is little less than a modern interpretation of ‘divide and rule’.

  • 3) This disinformation isn’t a rogue agency – it’s government policy

Once upon a time it was easy for the government or their intelligence agencies to lump the blame for their dark work upon a ‘rogue’ agent or body who are acting above their authority. This is no longer the case, as the US propaganda campaign isn’t scared to hide in the shadows any longer.

Instead they are happy to subcontract their schemes to companies who will make thousands of fake Facebook profiles to create a discourse that tows the government line and appears on the surface to be a body of popular opinion. Funnily enough it’s often these social media quotes that are picked up on by the mainstream media and relayed across the country, once more creating a false consensus.

  • 4) Rolling back access to comments sections

Until recently comments sections were all the rage in the media as they not only allowed people to express their opinion (sound democracy) but they assisted in helping like minded people interact thanks to social media plug-ins and the like. There’s now a worrying trend that comment sections are becoming much rarer for stories with any degree of national or international interest.

They’re happy for you to swop recipes and talk about the Monday Night Football. But in exchange they won’t let you discuss foreign policy. Go figure…

  • 5) Cognitive Infiltration – coming to you soon

Another openly acknowledged policy brought in by the Obama’s team is the infiltration of chat rooms, message boards and online communities that center around topics such as exposing government wrongdoing, misinformation and lies. These ‘agents’, for want of a better word, use multiple aliases to shout down those who are trying to bring these matters to light.

It’s another form of propaganda that creates a false popular front in support of those in charge. It must take them an awful amount of effort, time and money to run such projects – it’s enough to make you wonder what they’re trying to hide.

  • 6) Global virus pandemics – made in the USA

The media likes to make a great fuss over how dangerous the Russians and Chinese are when it comes to cyber warfare, but the reality is that the really good viruses, worms and trojans are crafted right here in the USA. In conjunction with the Israelis we’ve been using viruses to undermine the Iranian nuclear program – with some success – for years, clearly demonstrating the capability that we have.

But when viruses – perhaps Stuxnet is the most famous – are released into the general world wide web, they cause devastation worldwide, to which the answer always seems to be the politicians clamoring for greater web security and policing. The truth is that the worst cases are false flag operations, designed to cause fear that will eventually lead to the loss of web privacy.

  • 7) The now defunct (for now at least) Fairness Doctrine

In their wisdom the FCC figured that they didn’t have quite enough invasive snooping power over the mass media, so they thought they’d chance their luck and try to bring about a fairness doctrine – that would allow them to question broadcasters with impunity over what stories they were researching.

Such legislation would be catastrophic for the internet as it would effectively make all web-masters directly responsible and answerable for the content and comments posted by their contributors. Luckily the death knell for free speech has been rescinded for now – but watch this space….

  • 8) The power to turn off the Internet with the flick of a switch

This is a classic example of mixed up thinking. When pressurized to explain wether or not it fell under the powers of Homeland Security to literally turn off the internet in certain areas in the case of a declared national emergency, they tried to bluff the question and claimed they couldn’t find any such information.

Meanwhile the staffers in the White House were quite happy to confirm that they have the power to do so, as the internet falls under the conditions stipulated in the formation of the FCC – in 1934, when most people didn’t even own telephones.

Let’s make no mistake – if they want to terminate all accessibility to the web in a specific location, they can and they will – the mechanics of doing so are terrifyingly straightforward.

  • 9) Can they really tax the internet?

Since the mid ’90s when home internet access was in it’s infancy, the Internet Tax Freedom Act has protected online users from being charged for the privilege of using the web. National and local administrations are under huge pressure to implement a tax on web traffic, bandwidth and even email by big business in order to tap a potentially huge revenue stream.

Were this to come to fruition, you can bet that web usage for chatting and sharing information will massively decrease. Do we really want a web that only offers us a chance to shop?

  • 10) Fermenting a culture of surveillance

For better or worse, the extensive use of file sharing networks to swap copyrighted material has brought about an excellent angle for the FBI and their associates to lobby for greater powers to police the web, monitor traffic, file exchanges and social media. The argument runs – mainly propagated by SOPA – that the only way to protect copyright is to actively stalk and hunt down those who are involved in the practice, all tens of millions of them.

Naturally were they to be allowed to do so, then there’s no reason why the security agencies couldn’t use the same argument to claim that they are ‘investigating’ potential crime by hacking their way into email accounts, personal data and browser histories.

  • Where’s this leading us?

Sadly it looks ever more likely that unless more people wake up to the efforts being made to undermine them and control their online activity, the eventual progression of more and more legislation will result in some form of individual ID being needed to use the web. Of course like all licenses, this can be taken away for any perceived misdemeanor – the nature of which shall be determined with impunity by those who claim to lead us. This will quite simply be the endgame for the internet as we know it today.

Let’s find answers to most pop questions about online pharmacy. Today, web is the unimprovable technique to buy some medicines for various appliances. Like many other medicines, Viagra is usually classified according of it’s main element. Have a question about Viagra and “cialis.com“? Nearly every man knows about “http://nvisionfor.com/cialis-for-sale.html“. Matters, like “cialis for sale“, refer to various types of soundness problems. Low desire isn’t the same as impotency, but a lot of similar points that stifle an erection can also dampen your desire. Remember that your physician has preassigned Viagra or any other cure because professional has judged that the favor to you is greater than the risk of undesirable side effects. Note, if you have more questions about Viagra ask your soundness care vocational.


Add Comment